2) If a user is struggling to make their own hardware work or would like help with their own programming within Issy and want a direct helpline to the team (beyond the extensive support on the forum, knowledge banks etc) then I have no problem with them being charged for that.
QLAB PRO VIDEO PRICING SOFTWARE
In terms of dedicated support from the team I have two thoughts: 1) If there is a bug in the software then we shouldn't be being charged for finding it. I think it would be a shame to put it behind a paywall as it's so inclusive. I think the forum is incredible and is usually the only support I need. Should we offer premium support and charge more for those who receive it? (Or offer a less expensive version that comes with forum-only support?).I think this would be especially useful when considering users around the world who aren't in a position to buy but could contribute on a show by show basis. Version Upgrades: £100-£150 ((every two years or so)Īnd as I've said above, rentals could count towards a purchase. I'm not so sure about monthly subscriptions simply because I think more people will be happy to pay if they can just pay when they need it (like QLab) rather than for all the time when they don't.
QLAB PRO VIDEO PRICING FULL
If the account system allowed these 'rentals' to be tracked they could count towards a discount off the full price when people are in a position to pay.
QLAB PRO VIDEO PRICING LICENSE
They can pay $5 per day for a few nights but not for a license outright. Often, on the same production that is using a demo version of Issy, they're using a QLab license by the day. I think a rent by the day license would see a huge number of individual artists and smaller companies paying on a show-by-show basis. In many instances this is fine, but in others they simply can't afford it and I either leave my machine there or they run it in demo mode knowing they can't make changes. Personally, when I work on a show using Issy I rarely leave my license on the show, it's on my laptop and stays with me. I have become a big fan of QLabs licensing system, you can own it outright, you can rent it by the day and your rentals count towards owning it outright. I do get grumpy with companies who sell you a license to own and then change to a subscription (adobe, deli-code, you guys can take a bow). I think most users are probably the same. I like having a license that I own and am happy to contribute for upgrades. "Buy-to-own" or a subscription? Which do you prefer.I know that I learnt a huge amount from the various example patches years ago but they could definitely do with an update. I think the best are around 'out of the box' examples: having ready made patches that new users could use as a vision-mixer, mapping tool, 'play-these-10-clips-in-order-with-a-crossfade' tool. I don't have any wild ideas - there are some good ones above. What would be your wildly unusual/crazy/unexpected means to ensure that Isadora grows and flourished.Anyone I double up with on ideas please take this as a blanket acknowledgement.
It does not store any personal data.Some very good points above. The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance". This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other. The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional". The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously. Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly.
0 kommentar(er)
